Does anyone else find it slighty hipocritical of UG to display advertisments for sites(mainly ones for "hot college girls") that have excessive nudity/sexuallityon the ads, but if a user were display an image with the same content they would be banned/suspended? Now I know that these ads are placed so we can continue enjoying the UG service for free and i truly do appreciate it, but it think either the ads should be replaced, or the rules should be made more linient.
UG is free, it gets revenue from these ads. It has no control over the ads.
they have no control over the adds, and if they allowed posting pornographic pictures or links they would have to make the site 18+
Actually those ads are alright, cause they don't have full nudity. And UG has no control over them anyway, I believe.
maybe if you spelled hypocrisy right then i would join your anti-ad revolution.......but no.
... What everyone else said.