Does anyone else find it slighty hipocritical of UG to display advertisments for sites(mainly ones for "hot college girls") that have excessive nudity/sexuallityon the ads, but if a user were display an image with the same content they would be banned/suspended? Now I know that these ads are placed so we can continue enjoying the UG service for free and i truly do appreciate it, but it think either the ads should be replaced, or the rules should be made more linient.
I got bored of my old sig
UG is free, it gets revenue from these ads. It has no control over the ads.
According to BS statistics, 92% of teens have moved on to rap. If you're among the 8% who doesn't consider rap to be real music, donate your brains, as you clearly aren't using them.
they have no control over the adds, and if they allowed posting pornographic pictures or links they would have to make the site 18+
make Industrial and/or experimental electronic music? Join my group!

Actually those ads are alright, cause they don't have full nudity. And UG has no control over them anyway, I believe.
maybe if you spelled hypocrisy right then i would join your anti-ad revolution.......but no.
We have lingered in the chambers of the sea
By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown
Till human voices wake us, and we drown.

- T.S. Eliot

... What everyone else said.
D E N V E R B R O N C O S vs. S E A T T L E S E A H A W K S