#1
Does anyone else find it slighty hipocritical of UG to display advertisments for sites(mainly ones for "hot college girls") that have excessive nudity/sexuallityon the ads, but if a user were display an image with the same content they would be banned/suspended? Now I know that these ads are placed so we can continue enjoying the UG service for free and i truly do appreciate it, but it think either the ads should be replaced, or the rules should be made more linient.
I got bored of my old sig
#2
UG is free, it gets revenue from these ads. It has no control over the ads.
According to BS statistics, 92% of teens have moved on to rap. If you're among the 8% who doesn't consider rap to be real music, donate your brains, as you clearly aren't using them.
#3
they have no control over the adds, and if they allowed posting pornographic pictures or links they would have to make the site 18+
make Industrial and/or experimental electronic music? Join my group!

Last.fm
#4
Actually those ads are alright, cause they don't have full nudity. And UG has no control over them anyway, I believe.
Peace.
#5
maybe if you spelled hypocrisy right then i would join your anti-ad revolution.......but no.
We have lingered in the chambers of the sea
By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown
Till human voices wake us, and we drown.


- T.S. Eliot


#7
... What everyone else said.
SUPER BOWL XLVIII
D E N V E R B R O N C O S vs. S E A T T L E S E A H A W K S