Should i get a Krank Revolution REP 120W or a Krank Krankenstein + and would a marshall 1960b sound good with these amps. Do these amp sound good to anybody else
The Rev will have slightly less gain, and a chunkier sound as opposed to the Krankenstein +, which has a very defined lead tone/shred tone. As always, 1960 cabs are best used for a metal type sound because their fullness balances out the sizzle of hi-gain heads like the the Krankenstein and the Rev.

I'd, personally, go with the Rev but I also don't use that much gain and prefer a chunkier sound. Basically, if you play lead, go with the 'Stein and if you play ANYTHING else go with the Rev.
ESP Eclipse 300
Jackson RR3
Bugera 6262 head
Trace Elliot straight cab
Boss NS-2
Boss DD-3
Whats the difference between the Revolution 100W and the Revolution REP 120W , except for the wattage
The REP is the revolution+ so it is this years model and it has a boost switch for the kleen, a master presense control, and upgraded transformers. It is supposed to be much better than the rev1.
The Stein+ isn't only a lead amp, it's got a great rhythm metal tone too. I think it's got a little more aggressive growl in the midrange that I like, very raw and open sounding. I haven't tried a Rev+ for comparison, but the Stein+ kicks all kinds of ass for rhythm work.

I might reconsider the 1960B though. Not that it's a bad cab or anything, but I've tried the G12T75 speakers with the Stein+, and I don't think they work as well as the V30 and Texas Heat speakers I have. Loses some of that layered midrange sound, and kind gets a little harsh on the high end. The 1960AV or BV with V30 would work better IMO.
"The fool doth think he is wise, but the wiseman knows himself to be a fool." - W.S.
amp clips
amp vids