#1
ok having a slight little arguement with a friend.
my thoughts: white schecter c-1 fr is prettier than a transparent blue jackson rr3.
her thoughts: exact opposite.

back me up here?

schecter: http://www.musiciansfriend.com/document?base_pid=518491&cpd=0OEY&doc_id=99371&index=1

jackson: http://www.musiciansfriend.com/document?base_pid=512230&cpd=0OEY&doc_id=99371&index=0
Last edited by soccerguy6494 at Sep 2, 2008,
#4
Why does it matter, it's based on preference...

EDIT: In that case... a sunburst Strat.
Did you know the odds of a Vault-Tec shelter failing are 1,763,497 to 1?

So imagine life in a Vault-Tec Vault. Not just a future.
A brighter future... underground.

Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter.
Last edited by FloyDZeD at Sep 2, 2008,
#9
Quote by soccerguy6494
going on prettyness here. not how good it is

1) It is subjective.
2) Your spanish is incorrect.
However, I agree that the Schecter is prettier.
Gear:
Schecter C-1 Hellraiser
Ibanez GRG170DX
Peavey Vypyr 75
Fender Princeton 650 DSP w/ Celestion 80w speaker
#10
Quote by Friendly Stoat
1) It is subjective.
2) Your spanish is incorrect.

that's the second time someone told me that. i'm starting to think that it's not right
#11
I think the Schecter is prettyer.
Don't know which one is better though
Quote by Retro Rocker


....


haha

*wipes tear from eye*
Oh you're good.
#13
RR3+trans Blue=WIN.
Life is like an Empty Box, there could be something exciting in it at first look, but upon further review, well, it's empty.

#14
I'd say the Schecter looks better, but that doesn't necessarily mean I think it's a better guitar.
Metal Forum Popular Vote Winner!!!

Quote by webbtje
Quote by dead-fish
And you're obviously here because you fancy Phill.
Phill is a very attractive guy...

"I'm so tempted to sig that, Phill" - Sig it then

Unless otherwise stated, assume everything I say is in my opinion.
#15
Quote by Phill-Rock
I'd say the Schecter looks better, but that doesn't necessarily mean I think it's a better guitar.


+1
i used to be a mod, then i took an arrow in the knee.
#17
I personnaly think that the RR is prettier. Not a huge fan of schecter.
Peavey 3120
Mesa 2x12 Rectifier Cabinet
Jackson RR5
Jackson DKMG
LTD EC-1000
TC Electronic Polytune
BOSS RV-5
BOSS DD-7
MXR 10-band EQ
EHX Small Clone
Dunlop 535Q Crybaby
BOSS NS-2
Voodoo Lab Pedal Power 2+
#18
Quote by MetalMilitia212
They're both pretty ugly. White with black hardware? Really?

i actually think that looks nice
#19
So do I.

I'm sick of seeing gold hardware on everything.
Metal Forum Popular Vote Winner!!!

Quote by webbtje
Quote by dead-fish
And you're obviously here because you fancy Phill.
Phill is a very attractive guy...

"I'm so tempted to sig that, Phill" - Sig it then

Unless otherwise stated, assume everything I say is in my opinion.
#21
Yeah white and black hardware is awesome... but i hate the body of the RR bul love the neck and headstock... where as i love the Schecter body but hate the headstock.... but i love randy rhoads... so....

TIE!!! so Ibanez PGM301 wins lol my fav... cause paul gilbert is the best...
In your eyes I see the darkness that tourments you, and in your head where it dwells, I'll give you my hand if you reach out and grab it, let's walk away from this hell.
#23
There are some good looking Schecters but that's a pretty boring looking one tbh. Don't really like Vs like that, but the finish is quite nice. So a compromise. Schecter shape with that blue flame finish = win.
Why did Pat Metheney cross the road? He didn't, his hair got in the way
--
Member #1 of Ibanez > You club. PM me to join
#24
Don't consider either pretty. The Schecter looks better than the Jackson - and only cos the Jackson is a V.
American Deluxe maple board Strat
Hot Rod Deluxe
Fulltone Fulldrive II mosfet
#25
that blue rr3 looks sooo much better
Quote by Mr. La Fritz
"all fatties report to the gym!"


Quote by mosh_face

music should only sound like a train running into a wall of BC riches plugged into line 6 spiders
#26
I think the Schecter would look better if it didn't have those dot inlays... it just sort of ruins the guitar.

Personally, i really don't like either.
O O

___
#27
The pictures online don't do it justice.


Sorry about the hugeness. I think i learned somewhere along the line how to resize them according to pixels but i forgot
#28
Quote by HighPotency
The pictures online don't do it justice.

***SEXY PICTURE***

Sorry about the hugeness. I think i learned somewhere along the line how to resize them according to pixels but i forgot
Why does this one not have dot inlays?
O O

___
#30
Quote by TheBax
Why does this one not have dot inlays?

its a hellraiser fr. it has a set-neck, origianal floyd, and better pickups.
oh and a shiny binding
#32
once i saw that shecter and creamed my pants cus i love white gutiars.
then i saw and played that jackson and creamed my pants even more
ƒuck your nuts
#34
i'd take the jackson

however, if it was the c-1 hellraiser it would be much closer imo because it has that sexy binding and all
#36
i personally like the crimson swirl rr3 more than both trans blue color on the rr3 and the schecter, based on looks, although the rr3 is also a kickass guitar all around
Quote by Hpda5121
im not a racist because racism is a crime, and crime is for black people

fender mexican fat strat (discontinued)
mesa triple recto
digitech grunge
digitech death metal