#1
Is there any reason for me to go with the 212 instead of the 112 other than the watt difference?

I have about $650 to spend on a new amp come Christmas time, but if I can I'd like to put some money toward a new guitar. So would it be better for me to go with the 112 and save $120 or get the 212?

I'm more of a bedroom rocker than a gigging musician, so I don't see why I would need more than 50w.
#2
you wouldn't even need that for a bedroom cos its a tube amp and a bloody loud one!
#3
a 20W tube amp will be too loud for bedroom practise :p
Founder Of The "Jimmy Page Stole All Of My Potential Riffs" Club PM To Join!.

Quote by CoreysMonster
Meh, I usually just buy them off the local shaman, unless I'm in the wilderness, where I rely on raw meat to raise my HP.
#4
Definetly get the 112. 50w is plenty for most gigs unless you're playing a stadium or something, and having the 212 just means spending more money when you have to change tubes or if you want a speaker upgrade.
Gear:
Schecter C-1 Hellraiser
Ibanez GRG170DX
Peavey Vypyr 75
Fender Princeton 650 DSP w/ Celestion 80w speaker
#6
If you're only playing in your bedroom you won't be able to put the 112 above 1 or 2 on the lead channel, and not above 3 on the clean channel... but it's still good to have in case you perform somewhere.
Quote by DeathByDestroyr
What the hell is a G&L.



Quote by Flux'D
Gay & Lesbian I think, the box smelled funny
Greg what did you send me??
#7
Although with the 212, you have more possibilities with speaker changes. Mixing speakers often sounds great!
#8
I'd go with the 112. I recently got a 212 and was playing able to play Nickleback type songs with the volume nob on 3. Hell, I don't think its even been above 4 yet.

So yeah, defiantly go for the 112 for bedroom type stuff. It'll still be more than loud enough to play with friends or small gigs if you need to.