Minutes to Midnight review by Linkin Park

logo Ultimate Guitar
  • Released: May 11, 2007
  • Sound: 2
  • Lyrics: 4
  • Overall Impression: 4
  • Reviewer's score: 3.3 Poor
  • Users' score: 7.2 (853 votes)
Linkin Park: Minutes to Midnight
5

Sound — 2
Linkin Park used to have such a unique sound featuring a flawless blend of samples and piano with the standard heavy guitars of the genre. Minutes to Midnight doesn't have any of the intesity or heavieness of Meteora of Hybrid Theory. The album sounds extremely weak and generally unimpressive. The guitar sound is the first problem I had with the album. Instead of Brads normal PRS guitar and Marshall and Mesa amp blend he has reverted to vintage instruments and amps. His choice of vintage tube amps and strats would be perfect for a blues band, not a Nu Metal band like Linkin Park. Joseph Hann seems to have played a much smaller role in the album as well. The signature samples and dj scratching are hardly heard in any songs. The vocals have changed drastically as well. Mike sings and raps much less on the album than past albums although the sings "Hands Held High" by himself. The dual scream/rap vocals of past albums has been completely eradicated off of this album. The sound of this album is a major let down. Linkin Park lost almost all of their signature sound which make me ask the question "why buy the album if it doesn't even sound like Linkin Park at all?"

Lyrics — 4
The lyrics are not what you might expect. They are much more political on Minutes to Midnight than past albums. "Hands Held High" is definitely the stand out political track on the album, it seems like a rant on the Bush administration and the war on Iraq. The first single "What I've Done" is a track that points out humanities ill effects on the environment. While I have no problems with the lyrics they aren't up to par with lyrics on their other albums. There isn't as much depth, angst, or meaning in the lyrics which is a real bummer.

Overall Impression — 4
Linkin Park has long been a favorite band of mine. I love the mix of samples, heavy guitar, bass, and the occasional piano that Linkin Park so flawlessly mixes together. This album fell short is so many ways, the main reason was that Linkin Park not only changed style, it seems like they lost their identity. The music on the album is decent but lacky the intensity and originality of past albums. The slow ballads on the album would be the only highpoint of the album as the heavier tracks sound weak and uninspired. I honestly can't recommend this album or completely deter you from buying, I would recommend checking out this album any way you can and make up your own mind about it. You may love the new direction of Linkin Park, but I feel like I lost one of my favorite bands.

4 comments sorted by best / new / date

    wildchild6660
    DTFatesWarningX wrote: lol@ whoever said Corey Taylor was better than Maynard.....also come to think of it lol@at the notion that Corey Taylor is a good vocalist
    serj is better than both of them
    rayq78
    What Ive Done was really awesome! but i hate the tamborine and the "na na na" part. What is this? they over decorated the songs. it could have been better without those. The other track with the "amen...amen.." i also hate...please bring back the Hybrid Theory and Meteora sound. Those sound are are still in these days....pls Mr. Shinoda...i beg you...
    PUNISHER210
    i agree rayq78...this cd is to soft imean it's all right...but it's a step back for LP
    castoo
    his voice isn't anything special, it's just the WAY he sings, it really isn't hard to replicate but no one else uses it corey taylor is a HORRIBLE VOCALIST, the guy cannot sing maynard isn't great, just unique serj isn't great, just unique and wow corey taylor sucks (i like maynard and serj) ben burnley anders friiden probably my favorite, but i don't think they are the best... hmmm.... that black guy from kse is hella good though